Fourth-year student Ikaneng Yingwane looks at the complexities of end-of-life care, and the ethical responsibilities of doctors along with it.

______

As a medical student, I have come to realise that death and dying are centred around ethics that are multifaceted and profound. I believe that healthcare professionals, and future ones (medical students) are entrusted with the responsibility of not only treating ailment, but also navigating the complexities of end-of-life care with compassion, empathy, and respect for human dignity.

When it comes to death and dying, the acknowledgement of beneficence and autonomy principles come to mind. Beneficence can be fulfilled by that patients get relevant pain management, symptom relief, and emotional support to alleviate suffering and promote comfort in their final moments of life. This might involve engaging in difficult conversations about treatment options including the possibility of hospice or palliative care and respecting the autonomy in making decisions about end-of-life care. In respecting the patient’s autonomy, the healthcare provider appreciates the patient's right to make informed decisions about their own healthcare including choices regarding treatment and withdrawing or withholding of life-sustaining interventions.

Medical students as health professionals in training ought to be cognisant of their communication skills, and efficacy when communicating with patients and their families, providing them with the information and support they need to make decisions that align with their values, preferences, and goals of care. However, striking a balance between autonomy and beneficence can be challenging, especially when patients express preferences that may conflict with medical recommendations. In such cases, it is important to have open, honest and empathetic conversations exploring the reasons behind the patient’s decisions and collaborating with interdisciplinary teams to find solutions that both ethical principles to the greatest extent possible.

Additionally, the principles of non-maleficence and justice should be considered when faced with the concept of death and dying. In the context of non-maleficence, not only is the focus on avoiding treatment that causes physical harm, but it also includes social, psychological, and existential crises. Medical students ought to learn to recognize and address the emotional and spiritual needs of dying patients and their families, providing compassionate support, and facilitating discussions around legacy, closure, and the search for meaning in the face of mortality. With respect to the justice principle, it underscores the importance of fair and equitable access to end-of-life care resources for all patients, regardless of their cultural background, socioeconomic factors, or medical diagnosis. Healthcare professionals need to advocate for policies and practices that promote equitable distribution of palliative and hospice services, as well as culturally sensitive approaches to end-of-life care that respects the diversity of values and beliefs within society.

Finally, as aspiring healthcare providers, we ought to continually reflect on our own values, limitations, and biases in caring for dying patients. This includes recognizing the emotional toll that death and dying can have on healthcare providers and seeking support, and supervision when needed. By cultivating empathy, self-awareness, and resilience, we can strive to uphold the highest ethical standards in providing compassionate and dignified care to patients at the end of life. 

The ethics surrounding death and dying are complex and nuanced and require to be navigated with a delicate balance between the principles of bioethics. By approaching end-of-life care with compassion, empathy, and a commitment to upholding the dignity and well-being of patients, we can fulfil our ethical responsibilities as future healthcare professionals and support individuals and their families through the final stages of life’s journey.